Petitioner challenged a matter but died before disposal. Court held the writ petition becoming infructuous due to the petitioner's death and disposed of the petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010119002020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3973/2020
BHARAT KUMAR
S/O SRI SUGREEV PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RASULABAD, DIST SANT KABIR NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH 272173
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHATRA SEEMA BAL EAST BLOCK. V R K PURAM NEW DELHI 11006
3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL SASHATRA SEEMA BAL SECTOR 11Q BONGAIGAON ASSAM 783380
4:THE COMMANDANT 31ST BATTALION SASHATRA SEEMA BAL GOSSAIGAON ASSAM 78336
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. O P BHATI
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE
Page No.# 2/2
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 13-06-2023
Mr. P. Sarma, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that his client has expired and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the nature of relief that has been sought in the writ petition.
Taking note of the submission of Mr. Sarma, this writ petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Bharat Kumar
The Union of India
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
