The Gauchati High Court closed the writ petition as infructuous after counsel submitted that the grievance was redressed by State authorities, causing the matter to have no further legal residue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008602023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/292/2023
Amping Megu Deputy Director, APEDA, Itanagar, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors. Through the Commissioner/Secretary Power, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:the Chairman (Governing Body) Age: 0 Occupation : 3:the Director Age: 0 Occupation : 4:Zara Taw Sorang Age: 0 Occupation
Advocate for the Petitioner : Muk Pertin, Senior Advocate
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
08.11.2023
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance raised in the writ petition has already been redressed by the State authorities. Accordingly, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the writ petition.
In view of such submission, matter stands closed being infructuous.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Amping Megu
The State of AP and 3 Ors.
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
