Petitioner submitted the writ petition had become infructuous as the grievance was redressed. The court closed the petition on this ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005892023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/214/2023
Habung Nyipa S/o Late Habung Pussang, Resident of Borum II, Near Railway Station. PO Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 791110. Contact No. 9862237238
VERSUS
THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented by the Secretary, PWD, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation
Advocate for the Petitioner : Subu Koyang
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
06.11.2023
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, this present writ petition stands closed being infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Habung Nyipa
The State of AP
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
