The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioner's withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh, as prayed by the counsel.
Prayer for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008202023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 281/2023
1:Taying Gallo
S/o late Taying Tapu, R/o Model village, Naharlagun, Papum Pare district, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
1:The Extra Assistant Commissioner and 2 ors
Itanagar Capital Complex, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh
2:Janu Taying S/o late Taying Tapu R/o Model village Naharlagun Papum Pare district Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Smti Taying Sumi W/o Shri Janu Taying R/o Model village Naharlagun Papum Pare district Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Tai Shiva
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 21-06-2023
Heard Mr. T. Shiva, learned counsel for the petitioner.
After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed.
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Taying Gallo
The Extra Assistant Commissioner and 2 ors
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
