Writ petition filed by employees challenging a order. Petitioner requested withdrawal with liberty to file afresh. Respondent opposed initially but consented to withdrawal. Court disposed of the petition on withdrawal.
Writ petition disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010003832023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/262/2023
PALLAB JYOTI ROY AND 3 ORS S/O. MOMEN ROY, VILL. FUTKI BARI GOURANG TARI PT-II, P.O. FUTKI BARI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783345.
2: PRASENJIT ROY
S/O. TARACHAND ROY VILL. KAUNIABHASA P.O. KALIPUKHURI DIST. KOKRAJHAR (BTR) PIN-783369.
3: BIMAL ROY
S/O. AJIT CHANDRA ROY VILL. TARE GAON P.O. KALIPUKHURI DIST. KOKRAJHAR (BTR) PIN-783369.
4: BIKRAM RAY
S/O. SIBEN CHANDRA RAY VILL. GHANDAL P.O. CHIPON CHILA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA,
Page No.# 2/3
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE UNION OF INDIA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PERSONAL PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPT. OF PERSONAL AND TRAINING NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001.
3:STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION
REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN LOCHI ROAD BLOCK NO.12 CGO COMPLEX NEW DELHI-110003.
4:REGIONAL DIRECTOR (NER)
STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION HOUSEFED COMPLEX LAST GATE- BASISTHA ROAD P.O. ASSAM SACHAVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 12-05-2023
Mr. I. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions
from his client to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned CGC submits that although he had earlier taken a stand
Page No.# 3/3
opposing the prayer, yet, since there is no instruction from his client to object the prayer made by the petitioner’s counsel for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. As such, he is agreeable to the prayer made by the petitioner’s counsel.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with
liberty to file afresh.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Pallab Jyoti Roy and 3 ors
Union of India and 3 ors
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
