This court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous without substantial reasoning, vacating any interim order if passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005122022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 171/2022
1:Rending Tayo Beki S/o Late Tayo Tagung,
Permanent Resident of Kesang Putu, PO Raka and PS Ziro, District Lower Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and Anr.
Represented through Principle Chief Conservator of Foreset, Itanagar Department of Environment and Forest Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. P.O. Itanagar. Pin Code 791111.
2:The Divisional Forest Officer Hapoli Forest Division Ziro P.O. Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh Pin Code 79112
Advocate for the Petitioner : T Torum
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 14-03-2023
Heard Mr. T. Torum, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous.
Interim order passed earlier, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rending Tayo Beki
THE STATE OF AP
NANI TAGIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
