Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Court allowed prayer, dismissed original petition, and vacated an earlier status quo order.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file afresh; status quo order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010058942023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1502/2023
VIJAY KUMAR JAIN
S/O LT. SOHANLAL JAIN R/O TULSIRAM ROAD TINSUKIA P.O. P..S AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNSING DEPTT. DIPSUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA
P.O. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786125
3:THE TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD
REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER GNB ROAD P.O. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786125
4:THE CHAIRMAN TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD GNB ROAD P.O. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 78612
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A HAWARI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
03.04.2023
Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel appears for the respondents.
Prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
Status quo order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Vijay Kumar Jain
The State of Assam
The Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam
The Deputy Commissioner Tinsukia
The Tinsukia Municipal Board
The Chairman Tinsukia Municipal Board
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
