Petitioners sought to withdraw the criminal petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal. The criminal petition is disposed of on withdrawal. No substantive legal ground is engaged.
Prayer to withdraw the criminal petition allowed; criminal petition disposed of on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040006182023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn. 79/2023
1:Lishi Tajam @ Tai and 2 Ors. S/o Late Lishi Lel,
Resident at Model Village, Naharlagun, PO/PS Naharlagun, PO/PS Naharlagun, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Lishi Adap Nabam W/o Nabam Jairam Resident of Model Village Naharlagun PO/PS Naharlagun PO/PS Naharlagun District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh.
3: Lishi Rina @ Tina W/o Lishi Tajam Resident of Model Village Naharlagun PO/PS Naharlagun District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP
Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Arunachal Pradesh Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Permanent Bench, Naharlagun.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 19-06-2023
Mr. L. Kagung, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the criminal petition.
Prayer is allowed.
This criminal petition is disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Lishi Tajam @ Tai
Lishi Adap Nabam
Lishi Rina @ Tina
The State of AP
KardaK Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
