Murshida Begum v. Mrinal Hazarika
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the Gauhati High Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to re-file after correcting defects and closed the file.
In a contempt petition, the Gauhati High Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to re-file after correcting defects and closed the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010262152023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/718/2023
MURSHIDA BEGUM
D/O- ABDUL GONI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARAMAI BHETI, P.O. DAGAON, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782124
VERSUS
MRINAL HAZARIKA
THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, JURIA ICDS PROJECT, NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782124
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A HASSAN
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
04.12.2023
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are defects in filing the petition. Accordingly, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present contempt petition with a liberty to re-file the same after correcting the defects.
Page No.# 2/2
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed with the liberty as sought
for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Murshida Begum
Mrinal Hazarika
The Child Development Project Officer, Juria ICDS Project, Nagaon, Assam
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court