Pratap Sing Basumatari and 8 Ors. v. Md. V.K. Pipersenia and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In contempt proceedings challenging implementation of directions to create posts, the court held that necessary orders were passed by the government, satisfying the single judge's directions, and closed the cases allowing remedy if desired.
What did the court decide?
Contempt cases closed; liberty granted to avail appropriate remedy.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010024562015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/695/2015
PRATAP SING BASUMATARI and 8 ORS S/O. LT. DEBENDRA NATH BASUMATARI, VILL. JALAHGHAT, P.S. SIMLA, DIST. BAKSA, BTC, ASSAM.
VERSUS
MD. V.K. PIPERSENIA and ANR. THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY.-781006.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A K PURKAYASTHA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS.D MUSAHARYR-1
Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/476/2015
DIPAK NARZARY and 3 ORS. S/O LT. SAMALA NARZARY R/O NORTH NARAYANPUR P.O. NARAYANPUR P.S. MUSHALPUR DIST- BAKSA BTAD ASSAM
2: BHASKARJYOTI DAS S/O SHRI KHAGENDRA NATH DAS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a relief granted in the single judge's order to create posts has been implemented to the satisfaction of the court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRATAP SING BASUMATARI and 8 ORS
- petitioner
DIPAK NARZARY and 3 ORS
- petitioner
DWIPEN BARMAN and ANR
- respondent
MD. V.K. PIPERSANIA and ANR
- respondent
VINOD KUMAR PEPPERSANIA and 2 ORS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/695/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court