Petitioner sought closure of contempt proceedings, stating they were no longer desired. The court closed the contingent application accordingly.
Contempt application stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010290772019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/692/2019
TAKAR ETE
S/O- LT TATUM ETE, R/O- VILL- ABOR LEKU, P.S. JONAI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PH.NO. 7086494390
VERSUS
SANJIB KUMAR BHUYAN
DIRECTOR OF THE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GHY-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R MAZUMDAR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 04-12-2023
Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner is not desirous to continue with the present contempt proceedings and, accordingly, he prays for disposal of the same as not pressed.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of the above submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Application stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
TAKAR ETE
SANJIB KUMAR BHUYAN
DIRECTOR OF THE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
