The Gauhati High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail submitted by the applicant as there was non-prosecution, noting the petitioner had no counsel present for the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010230392023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/3531/2023
RAHUL SINGH THAPA
S/O- GOPAL SINGH THAPA, R/O- NARIKALBASTI, AMSING JORABAT, P.S. SATGAON, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P HAZARIKA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
04.12.2023
None appears for the petitioner on call.
Heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State of Assam.
It appears from record that on the last occasion, that is, on 29.11.2023,
Page No.# 2/2
also no counsel for the petitioner was present when this case was called on for hearing. It appears that this is a second application for anticipatory bail and on the earlier occasion, the prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court after perusal of the case diary.
As no one has appeared for the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this anticipatory bail application.
Hence, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant or dismiss the application for anticipatory bail.
Rahul Singh Thapa
The State of Assam represented by the P.P., Assam
Mridul Kumar Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
