Allowed

Riyajuddin Ahmed @ Bhaiti and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC3 Aug 2023AB/1827/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court converted an interim order granting anticipatory bail into an absolute order. The petitioners were facing charges for conspiracy, cheating, and violation of the Assam Game & Betting Act. The court imposed conditions regarding cooperation with investigation and refraining from committing similar offences.

What did the court decide?

Interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated 25.05.2023 is hereby made absolute subject to specified conditions.

Riyajuddin Ahmed @ Bhaiti and 2 Ors. Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Gauhati HC (2023)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010110212023

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/1827/2023

¶5

RIYAJUDDIN AHMED @ BHAITI AND 2 ORS. S/O NASIRUDDIN, VILL. AND P.O.- GHANSIMULI, P.S.- KHARUPETIA, DIST.- DARRANG, ASSAM.

¶6

2: MIJANUR RAHMAN @ MIZANUR RAHMAN S/O OMAN ALI VILL. AND P.O.- GHANSIMULI P.S.- KHARUPETIA DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM.

¶7

3: ZAHIDUL ISLAM @ MADAN S/O ARAB ALI VILL. AND P.O.- GHANSIMULI P.S.- KHARUPETIA DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P.

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶11

BEFORE

¶12

Page No.# 2/3

¶13

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

¶14

ORDER

¶15

03.08.2023

¶16

Heard Mr. M. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

¶17

This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, namely (1) Riyajuddin Ahmed @ Bhaiti (2) Mijanur Rahman @ Mizanur Rahman and (3) Zahidul Islam @ Madan , apprehending their arrest in connection with Kharupetia P.S. Case No. 115/2023 registered u/s 120(B)/420 of the IPC R/W Sections 14/15 of Assam Game & Betting Act.

¶18

The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court.

¶19

It may be mentioned that by order, dated 25.05.2023, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

¶20

Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the petitioners appeared before the investigating officer and got their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as per the interim pre arrest bail granted earlier. There is no adverse report against the petitioners from the I.O.

¶21

Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 25.05.2023is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions-

¶22

(i) That the petitioners shall co-operate in investigation as and when required;

¶23

Page No.# 3/3

¶24

(ii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

¶25

(iii) That the petitioners shall refrain from committing any similar offences in future of which they are accused or suspected of commission.

¶26

Return the case diary.

¶27

This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Riyajuddin Ahmed @ Bhaiti and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyajuddin Ahmed @ Bhaiti and 2 Ors. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahab Uddin @ Sahabuddin Ali Vs the Union of India

Md. Taser Ali @ Salam Ali Vs the State of Assam

Jintu Das Vs the State of Assam

The State of Assam and Anr. Vs Abdul Khaleque

Jasbir Sangma Vs the State of Assam

Md. Imran Ansari Vs the State of Assam