The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject-matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010050762017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7111/2017
RANGDULAL DEY
S/O- LATE MANIK CHANDRA DEY, R/O- SHREE PUNIYA, WARD NO.1, P.O AND P.S- TINSUKIA, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 06
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TINSUKIA DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM
3:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD TINSUKIA ASSAM
4:THE CHAIRPERSON
TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD TINSUKIA ASSAM
5:RATAN SEAL WARD COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD TINSUKI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B CHETRI
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A K GUPTA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2022
Mr. K. Kashyap, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject-matter of this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Kashyap, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rangdulal Dey
The State of Assam
The Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt of Assam, Municipal Administrative Deptt., Dispur, Ghay-06
The Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia District
The Executive Officer, Tinsukia Municipal Board
The Chairperson, Tinsukia Municipal Board
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
