The petitioner filed a writ petition stating a missing girl was recovered. The counsel submitted the petition is no longer pressed and the court dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010205112021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6654/2021
WAHIDA KHATUN
W/O. ANYAT ULLAH, R/O. KACHARIBORI, P.S. LAHARIGHAT, DIST. MARIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MARIGAON ASSAM.
MARIGAON ASSAM.
5:OFFICER IN CHARGE LAHARIGHAT POLICE STATION LAHARIGHAT MARIGAON ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BOIRAGI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
07-01-2022
Heard Mr. P. Boiragi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for all the official respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
On instructions of the petitioner, Mr. Boiragi, learned counsel submits that the missing girl has been recovered and as such, he does not want to press this petition.
In view of above submission, Mr. Boiragi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Wahida Khatun
The State of Assam
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
