Dismissed
Azad Choudhury v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/5780/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010178182022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010178182022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010178182022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5780/2022
AZAD CHOUDHURY
S/O. MOHAMMED ALI CHOUDHURY, R/O. 451, RAJAMAIDAM ROAD, P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785001.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
3:JORHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD
REP. BY THE CHAIRPERSON JORHAT ASSAM.
4:THE CHAIRPERSON
JORHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD DIST. JORHAT ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 05/09/2022
Mr. D. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of settlement has
already been issued and, therefore, the challenge made in this writ petition has become infructuous.
Ms. B.B. Hussain, learned counsel is present on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4
whereas, Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Government Advocate, Assam, has appeared on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 2.
In view of the submission made by the petitioner’s counsel, this writ petition stands disposed of being infructuous.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
AZAD CHOUDHURY
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DISPUR GUWAHATI
JORHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD
THE CHAIRPERSON JORHAT MUNICIPAL BOARD
sukhamay
shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court