Petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates including today. Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010021572015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5655/2015
GAMALA BORO
S/O LT. RATI RAM BORO, R/O KATHALBARI, SALBARI, P.S. NOONMATI, GHY-20, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BHANGAGARH GHY-32 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT GHY-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, G M D A
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 01-02-2022
The record reveals that on 10.12.2018, 30.01.2019, 07.01.2021 as well as 04.02.2021 none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Today also none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
It seems that the petitioner is not interested to further pursue with this instant proceeding. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
GAMALA BORO
THE STATE OF ASSAM
THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
