Tapir Mize and Anr. v. the State of Ap and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC040013082022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC040013082022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040013082022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 403/2022
1:Tapir Mize and Anr. Proprietor of M/s Mize Store, S/o Talung Mize, R/o Village Pessing, PO Pessing, PS Rumgong, District Siang, Arunachal Pradesh, Pin 791002
2: Tagin Taga 8Proprietor of Pitgong Kaying Enterprises
R/o Village Jonuo PO and PS Rumgong District Siang Arunachal Pradesh Pin 79100
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors.
Represented by the Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Rural Development Department, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, Pin 791111
2:The Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Department of Finance Block No.1 1st Floor AP Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh PIN 791111
3:The Director
Page No.# 2/2
of Rural Development Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Pin 791111
4:The Project Director District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) Siang Boleng Arunachal Prades
Advocate for the Petitioner : R P Sarmah
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
Date : 09-11-2022
Mr. D. Loyi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
Mr. B. Picha, learned Standing counsel for the Rural Development Department has no objection to the prayer.
In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Interim order passed earlier, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tapir Mize and Anr.
THE STATE OF AP
NELSON SAILO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court