Dipali Choudhury v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher appointed earlier, approached the court claiming non-payment of arrear salary despite completing her training. The High Court directed the Director to submit a fresh proposal for arrear salary within 15 days, allowing the Commissioner to process payment thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Director of Elementary Education to submit a proposal for arrear salary within 15 days; Commissioner to pass orders after receipt.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010134052020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3884/2020
DIPALI CHOUDHURY
W/O SRI RUDRASINGH CHOUDHURY, R/O BARBANG, (CHOUDHURY PARA), P.O. BARBANG, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781325
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY., TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. ASSAM DISPUR GHY-6
3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 5:THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BAJALI SUB-DIVISION PATHSALA DIST- BARPETA
Page No.# 2/4
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Director of Elementary Education should submit a new proposal for payment of arrear salary of the petitioner.
Whether the Commissioner shall pass appropriate orders upon receipt of the proposal for paying arrear salary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dipali Choudhury
- respondent
State of Assam
- respondent
Commissioner and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam Education
- respondent
Commissioner and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam Finance
- respondent
Director of Elementary Education Assam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/3884/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court