Petitioner challenged rejection of police constable candidature due to alleged fake certificate. Court allowed withdrawal of petition with liberty to file afresh and dismissed the writ.
Prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh allowed; writ petition dismissed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010093302022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3201/2022
MOTIOR RAHMAN
S/O. LT. SAYED ALI, VILL. BAGHEKHAITI, P.S. MERERCHAR, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF HOME, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07.
3:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (TAP)
ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07.
4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN.)
ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07.
5:THE STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD
ASSAM
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
Page No.# 2/3
REHABARI GUWAHATI-08.
6:THE DISTRICT LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD
BONGAIGAON REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM SUPERITENDENT OF POLICE BONGAIGAON ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 06.06.2022
Heard Mr. P. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner’s candidature for the post of U.B and A.B Constable has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner had submitted a fake certificate, without the respondent’s clarifying as to what certificate was fake and the reason for the same being fake.
Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel for the State respondent submits that the computer efficiency certificate submitted by the petitioner was obtained from a bogus and nonfunctional Institute and as such, CID HQ P.S. Case no. 5/2022 under section 120B/420/468/471 IPC has been registered. He submits that the investigation is being carried out at the moment and no final report has been made by the police as on date.
Mr. P. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is allowed.
Page No.# 3/3
The writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be dismissed on withdrawal without prejudice.
MOTIOR RAHMAN
THE STATE OF ASSAM
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
