Writ petition withdrawn on death of petitioner. Court closed the writ petition upon instruction from the petitioner's counsel regarding the death of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008172021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 276/2021
1:Takar Tachang
S/o Lt. Hare Tachang, village Seramso, P.O/P.S Pakke Kessang, District Pakke Kessang, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors.
Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner/Secretary(UD) Govt. of A.P Itanagar
3:D.K. Thungon Executive Engineer (Functional) UD and Housing Basar Division Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh
4:Laya Nabam
C/o Chief Engineer Office (UD and H) Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanaga
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 04-03-2022
Both sides are duly represented.
Upon instruction, Mr. G. Lollen, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired and therefore, he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition.
The prayer is allowed.
This writ petition stands closed on withdrawal on death of the petitioner.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Takar Tachang
The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Commissioner/Secretary(UD) Govt. of A.P
D.K. Thungon
Laya Nabam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
