Disposed
Akuli Mipi and 3 Ors. v. Daljit Singh Chawdhary and 5 Ors.
Gauhati HCIA(C)/6/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC040000252022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC040000252022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040000252022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 6/2022
1:Akuli Mipi and 3 Ors. S/o Late Mana Mipi, Permenent Resident of Village Mipido, PO/PS Anini, Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh
2: Katu Mipi S/o Late Mana Mipi
Permanent Resident of Village Mipido PO/PS Anini Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh
3: Laso Mipi S/o Lt. Mana Mipi
Permanent Resident of Village Mipido PO/PS Anini Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh.
4: Rusiya Melo D/o Lt. B. Melo
Permanent Resident of Mipi PO/PS Anini A.
VERSUS
1:Daljit Singh Chawdhary and 5 Ors.
Page No.# 2/3
The Inspector General, North East Frontier, HQ, ITBP, Police, MHA/Govt. of India, Khatting Hill, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 791111
2:Ajay Kumar Bhalla Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Govt. of India CGO Complex New Delhi
3:Surjeet Singh Deswal The Director General ITBP MHA Govt. of India Block 2. CGO Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi 110003
4:Sanjeev Raina The DIG SHQ Dibrugarh ITBP MHA/Govt. of India Mohanbari Distt. Dibrugarh Assam Pin 786012
5:Desh Raj The Assistant Commander 9th BN. ITBP Anini Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh PIN 79210
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 04-03-2022
Heard Mr. R. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicants.
In view of the nature of the prayer made in this application, the learned counsel for the applicants submits that this Interlocutory Application may be treated as an additional affidavit in connection with the connected Cont.Cas. (C)04(AP)/2020.
The prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants is allowed.
This Interlocutory Application shall now be treated as an additional affidavit in connection with the connected Cont.Cas.(C)04(AP)/2020, filed by the applicants/petitioners no. 4, 5, 6 and 7.
The matter stands disposed of in terms of above.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Akuli Mipi and 3 Ors.
Daljit Singh Chawdhary and 5 Ors.
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court