In a writ petition, the Gauhati High Court dismissed the proceeding as infructuous because counsel submitted for the parties that the petitioner had already gone for voluntary retirement, rendering the matter moot.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005912022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/274/2022
HAV/GD ANUP KUMAR KHIRALI FORCE NO. 850820925 S/O. LT. B.C. KHIRALI, PRESENTLY POSTED AT CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, GROUP CENTRE , AMERIGOG, GUWAHATI, PIN-781023.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI110003.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CENTRAL GOVT. OFFICE COMPLES NEW DELHI-110001.
3:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
(ADMINISTRATION) NORTH EAST ZONE GUWAHATI.
4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
NORTH EASTERN SECTOR CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE SHILLONG MEGHALAYA PIN-793001.
5:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE GROUP CENTRE AMERIGOG
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI
PIN-781023.
6:THE COMMANDANT
GROUP CENTRE GUWAHATI CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE ASSAM PIN-781316
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
09-09-2022
Heard Ms. S. Saikia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. S. S. Roy, learned CGC.
Both the counsel appearing for the parties submits that petitioner has gone for voluntary retirement.
Accordingly, this petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order passed earlier, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the service status of the petitioner remains maintainable after voluntary retirement.
If the petitioner has retired voluntarily, does the litigation become infructuous.
Anup Kumar Khirali
Union of India
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
