The writ petition was closed by the Court based on the petitioner's counsel's statement that the petitioner did not wish to press the petition in its present form.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040006702021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 226/2021
1:Gem Dopum
S/O Late Gem Teri, village Talo, P.O/P.S Yachuli, Lower Subansiri Distt. A.P
VERSUS
1:The State of AP and Others
Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of A.P, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner (PWD) Govt. of A.P Itanagar
3:Lardik Kare Executive Engineer (Functional) PWD Nacho Division Upper Subansiri Distt.. A.
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A M BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
Date : 01-04-2022
Mr. Gamken Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that there is an instruction from the writ petitioner not to press with this writ petition any
Page No.# 2/2
further in the present form.
In view of such statements, the writ petition stands closed.
Ms. P. Pangu, learned junior Government Advocate, appears for the
respondent nos. 1 & 2.
The writ petition closed accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Gem Dopum
The State of AP and Others
A M BUJOR BARUA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
