Petitioner Jr. withdrew her bail petition as the charge-sheet was already filed. The Court granted liberty to approach the appropriate authority to file a bail application after the charge-sheet is submitted. No substantive bail order was passed.
Liberty to approach the Court where charge-sheet was submitted for moving bail application when filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040003742022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : BA 29/2022
1:Yatung Thama Wife of Sri Tajum Thama, Resident of Abotani Colony, Itanagar, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP Represented by its Public Prosecutor
Advocate for the Petitioner : Arup Bhattacharjee
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A M BUJOR BARUA
ORDER
Date : 01.04.2022
Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
It is stated that charge-sheet had already been filed and therefore, this bail petition is not pressed.
The petitioner is given liberty to approach the Court where charge-sheet
Page No.# 2/2
had been submitted for moving bail application which may be considered as per
law.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Yatung Thama
THE STATE OF AP
A M BUJOR BARUA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
