GAHC040007142022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
liberty to file petition afresh if the need arises
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040007142022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 213/2022
1:Tapan Mondal (Ex Driver), AP Donyi Polo Hotel Corporation Ltd. C Sector, S/o Subal Mondal, R/o T.G Apartment C Sector, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 9402241746
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 6 Ors. Through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, A.P Civil Secretariat, PO/PS Itanagar, District Papum Pare, AP
2:The Commissioner (Industries)
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh cum Director APIDFCL and Arunachal Pradesh Donyi Polo Hotel Corporation Ltd. C Sector District Papum Pare Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111.
3:The Secretary (Industries)
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh cum Managing Director APIDFCL and Arunachal Pradesh Donyi Polo Hotel Corporation Ltd. C Sector District Papum Pare Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111
4:The Secretary (Finance) Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh A.P Civil Secretariat
Page No.# 2/3
Itanagar District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh 791111
5:The Arunachal Pradesh Industrial Development and Financial Corporation Ltd. (APIDFCL) (A Government of Arunachal Pradesh Undertaking) C Sector Itanagar 791111. (Represented by its Managing Director.
6:The Arunachal Pradesh Donyi Polo Hotel Corporation Ltd.
(A Subsidiary Company of APIDFC Ltd.) C Sector Itanagar 791111. (Represented by its Managing Director.)
7:The AP Donyi Polo Hotel C Sector
Itanagar 791111. (Represented by its General Manager
Advocate for the Petitioner : Gimi Tarak
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.K.MEDHI
ORDER
Date : 16-06-2022
Shri G. Tarak, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he would like to withdraw this petition and file a representation before the authorities for redressal of his grievance. He, however, prays for a liberty to file petition afresh if the need arises.
Shri N. Lowang, learned Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh,
Page No.# 3/3
who is present, has not objected to the same.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed on withdrawal however with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tapan Mondal
The State of AP
S.K. MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
