Tanmoy Borah v. Prabhakar Shukla and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010041592022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010041592022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010041592022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1564/2022
TANMOY BORAH
S/O SHRI BUDHEN BORAH, PRESENTLY SERVING AS CIRCLE OFFICER, DHEKIAJULI REVENUE CIRCLE AND MAGISTRATE IN-CHARGE OF MUNICIPAL BOARD ELECTIONS, DHEKIAJULI MUNICIPAL BOARD, 2022, P/R/O HOUSE NO. 8, MAHANAGAR PATH, LALMATI, GUWAHATI-29, DISTKAMRUP(M), ASSAM, P/R/A DHEKIAJULI, P.S.-DHEKIAJULI, DISTSONITPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
PRABHAKAR SHUKLA AND 2 ORS.
S/O RAMESHWAR SHUKLA, R/O WARD NO.2 DHEKIAJULI TOWN, DHEKIAJULI, P.O. AND P.S.-DHEKIAJULI, PIN-784110, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SONITPUR TEZPUR-784001
3:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-0
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P SARMAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 03.06.2022
Ms. S.P. Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject-matter of this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tanmoy Borah
Prabhakar Shukla and 2 ORS.
The State of Assam
The Assam State Election Commission
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court