the order dated 27.03.2017, a conclusion was arrived at taking note of the grounds taken in the writ petition that a disputed question of fact was raised as regards the factual evaluation made by the Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia and further the grounds that were sought to be raised in the writ petition were also not raised by the review petitioner in their review before the Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Tinsukia as it transpired from the order dated 02.11.2010 of the Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia. However, even otherwise, the issues raised by the review petitioner being the Coal India Limited in WP(C)/318/2011 was also taken note of and given its consideration and upon a detailed deliberation, a view was formed that no fault could be found with the Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia in accepting the report of the Circle Officer and the contention that the Deputy Commissioner ought to have accepted the evaluation made by the official valuer as claimed by the review petitioner/writ petitioner in the said writ petition was unacceptable. Accordingly, the writ petition stood dismissed requiring the review petitioner being the Coal India Limited to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh) to the respondent no. 5. Being aggrieved by the order dated 23.07.2017 in WP(C)/318/2011, this review petition is instituted.
