stated herein, the aforesaid direction was given by this Court in the writ petition on concessions and agreement reached between the learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties in both the writ petition. 3. The petitioner in the instant case while seeking a review of the aforesaid order dated 17.12.2020, passed in WP(C)459(AP)/2019 as well as WP(C)510(AP)/2019, contends that while the Superintending Engineer Common Recruitment Rules, 2014, permit supersession of the seniors in the grade of Executive Engineer, the Office Memorandum dated 08.02.2002, issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, vide No. F.No.35034/7/97-Esst(D), on the other hand, does not permit supersession in a promotion made by following the principle of selection by merit. The aforesaid office memorandum dated 08.02.2002, issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India was adopted by the Government of Arunachal Pradesh for its application in the State by an office memorandum dated May 21st , 2008, issued by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, vide memo, F. No. OM-15/2001. Another office memorandum dated 28.08.2020, has also been issued by the Secretary to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Department of Administrations Reforms, vide F. No. AR.27/2020/243, whereby, Head of Office/Department was directed that, no supersession be allowed to occur while granting promotion, which further provided that the DPC shall not consider any proposal, which is contrary to the Office Memorandum dated 08.02.2002, issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, and further, that the DPC shall not consider any
