had issued a communication to the Senior Standing Counsel, Education Department. To the said communication, an enquiry report was stated to be enclosed. However, the affidavit so filed by the Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, Education (Elementary) Department on 19.11.2015, there is no mention whatsoever as regards the enquiry report. Now in the backdrop of the same, the learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that had the enquiry report been placed, the Court would have passed the judgment sought to be reviewed. 8. This Court is of the opinion that non filing of the enquiry report cannot be considered as an exercise of due diligence by the review petitioners inasmuch as, when the said enquiry report was very much within the knowledge of the Respondent authorities in the writ petition the same cannot be said to be a discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the review petitioner or could not produced by the review petitioners at the time when the judgment was passed or order made. This opinion of this Court on the basis that the review petitioners had all along knew that enquiry report was there and then also chose not to place before this Court and now after the judgment has been passed the review petitioners are of the opinion that the said enquiry report would have made a material difference. If on such opinion of the parties, judgments are allowed to be reviewed, it would lead to non ending of a litigation.
