In a contempt proceeding, counsel submitted that the impugned order was complied with during the case's pendency. The High Court accepted this submission and closed the contempt case.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010207252019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/504/2019
SANJIB GOSWAMI
S/O- MR. SAILENDRA KUMAR GOSWAMI, R/O- FLAT NO. 1 C, NABIN ENCLAVE, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR GEETANAGAR HIGH SCHOOL FIELD, P.O.BAMUNIMAIDAM, P.S.- GEETANAGAR, GUWAHATI- 21, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
LAKSHYESWAR GOSWAMI
S/O- LATE RAJESWAR GOSWAMI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (P.H.E.), GUWAHATI DIVISION NO. II, GUWAHATI-21, NEAR GOVERNMENT PRESS, P.O.- BAMUNIMAIDAM, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JYOTIRMOY ROY Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
19-09-2022
Ms. E. Nath, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri J. Roy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this contempt case, the order in question has been complied with. She accordingly, submits that the contempt case will be closed.
Accordingly, the contempt case stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sanjib Goswami
Lakshyewswar Goswami
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
