Hiramani Talukdar v. Tej Prasad Bhusal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of an order regarding compassionate appointment. The court held that due to a change in facts making the earlier order un-implementable, no contempt notice could be issued and the petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stands closed; liberty granted to seek modification of earlier order.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010213812021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/1/2022
HIRAMANI TALUKDAR
D/O. LT. LAKENDRA NATH TALUKDAR, R/O. VILL. MUGURIA (BASHYAPARA) P.O. MUGURIA, P.S. PATACHARKUCHI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781325.
VERSUS
TEJ PRASAD BHUSAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN, DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE, DIST. BARPETA.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a notice of contempt can be issued for non-compliance when a factual change makes the earlier order un-implementable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HIRAMANI TALUKDAR
- respondent
TEJ PRASAD BHUSAL
- respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN, DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE, DIST. BARPETA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/1/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court