In a single-line order dated 14-09-2022, the Court closed contempt proceedings after counsel submitted that the prior judgment has been complied with.
Contempt cases closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010022872021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/175/2021
ROHUL AMIN AKAND
S/O LATE AHMAD ALI AKAND, VILL-SATIPUR, P.O. AND P.S.-DHALIGAON, DIST-CHIRANG (BTAD), ASSAM
VERSUS
SIDHARTHO PRASAD BARUAH AND 3 ORS GENERAL MANAGER, IN CHARGE (CGM), IOCL-BGR, DHALIGAON, DISTCHIRANG, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN-783385
2:DEBOJIT GOGOI GENERAL MANAGER (TECHNICIAN) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST-CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN-783385
3:GEORGE ISHORARY
GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST-CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN-783385
4:SMTI. RUPA TAIKAM DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON
Page No.# 2/3
DIST-CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN-78338
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/151/2021
ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O LATE AHMAD ALI AKAND VILL. SATIPUR P.O. AND P.S. DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM.
VERSUS
SIDHARTHO PRASAD BARUAH AND 3 ORS GENERAL MANAGER IN CHARGE (CGM) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN 783385
2:DEBOJIT GOGOI
GENERAL MANAGER (TECHNICIAN) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN 783385 3:GEORGE ISHORARY GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL BGR DHALIGAON
Page No.# 3/3
DIST. CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN 783385 4:RUPA TAIKAM
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN 783385 -----------Advocate for : MD. R ALI Advocate for : appearing for SIDHARTHO PRASAD BARUAH AND 3 ORS
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 14-09-2022
Mr. A.M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this
Court has already been complied with and therefore, these contempt cases be closed.
Taking note of the submission of the petitioners’ counsel, these contempt cases
stands closed.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
ROHUL AMIN AKAND
SIDHARTHO PRASAD BARUAH AND 3 ORS
SUMAN SHYAM
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
