Lut Ahmed Barbhuiya v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this interim application connected to a writ petition, the Gauhati High Court permitted the applicant to correct a typographical error in the pleadings where a respondent was misidentified as respondent No. 4 instead of respondent No. 5. The court allowed the petitioners to make this amendment by hand.
What did the court decide?
The applicant was allowed to make a hand-written correction to the pleadings to replace 'Respondent No. 4' with 'Respondent No. 5'. The interim application was disposed of.