This application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was disposed of by making an interim granted on 14.02.2022 absolute, after finding that detention was unnecessary.
Interim protection granted on 14.02.2022 made absolute on the same terms and conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010024492022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/416/2022
BHASKAR JYOTI KALITA SON OF SRI BANTIRAM KALITA
R/O HOUSE NO. 1, NATUN NAGAR, NEAR L.G. TOWER, NARENGI, GUWAHATI-781026, UNDER NOONMATI P.S., DIST. KAMRUP (METROPOLITAN), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 18.04.2022.
Heard Mr. D. Goswami, the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
Page No.# 2/2
This is an application u/s 438 of Cr.P.C filed by the petitioner namely, Bhaskarjyoti Kalita, praying for pre-arrest bail in connection with Chaygaon P.S. Case No. 866/2017, under Sections 506/500/345/511 of the IPC.
The case diary is placed before this Court.
The petitioner came to know a girl in facebook. Their acquaintance slowly grew into a close relationship. Thereafter, for certain reasons, the relationship got soured and in facebook itself both sides started to exchange verbal battles by using obscene words.
After perusal of the case diary, this Court finds that the dispute between the petitioner and the said girl, does not require the petitioner to be detained in custody. Therefore, the interim protection granted to the petitioner by this Court, vide order dated 14.02.2022, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Return the case diary.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail in connection with the offences under Sections 506/500/345/511 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhaskar Jyoti Kalita
The State of Assam
Part hivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
