Rukiya Swobnam Choudhury v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
In a pre-arrest bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C regarding a cheating case arising from a matrimonial dispute, the court granted interim protection absolutely, holding the case is based on matrimonial issues and the petitioner does not deserve detention.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023932022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/390/2022
RUKIYA SWOBNAM CHOUDHURY W/O IFTIKAR HUSSAIN
R/O KARARA, BAIHATA CHARIALI, P.O.AND P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM-781381
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves bail in a cheating case based on a matrimonial dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rukiya Swobnam Choudhury
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Partshivjyoti Saikia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/390/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court