Rohul Amin v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice Kalyan Rai Surana extended the petitioner's interim pre-arrest bail for 10 days, granting liberty to apply for regular bail to the jurisdictional court.
What did the court decide?
Interim pre-arrest bail extended for 10 days.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010111402022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1562/2022
ROHUL AMIN S/O AMIR UDDIN R/O DIGIR PAM, NIRALA P.S. BAGHBAR DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 14.09.2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim pre-arrest bail for the petitioner requires extension.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohul Amin
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Kalyan Rai Surana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/1562/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court