Ms. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is the owner of a plot of land viz. Quing Land at Tato. A dispute arose between the petitioner and private respondent No. 3 on the said plot of land and therefore, the matter was taken-up by the Tato Kebang Body who gave a decision in favour of the Respondent No. 3 on 28.08.2008. Aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Circle Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Tato, West Siang District. The Assistant Commissioner vide its judgment & order, dated 04.07.2011, upheld the kebang decision. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the Addl. Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Mechukha, by filing an appeal(Annexure-IV). Despite filing the appeal, the said authority, according to the petitioner, has not disposed of the same. In the meantime, Tato came under the Shi-Yomi District. The petitioner, thereafter, approached the Deputy Commissioner, Shi-Yomi District, by way of submitting a representation on 15.02.2021(Annexure-V), praying for early disposal of the appeal. Thereafter, the petitioner again on 22.02.2021(Annexure-VI) filed another representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Shi-Yomi District, requesting the said authority, not to disburse any compensation amount to the Respondent No. 3 pending disposal of the appeal. However, as the appeal and the two representations have not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court.
