Dismissed
Manomaya Sarma v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/60/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010000882020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010000882020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010000882020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/60/2020
MANOMAYA SARMA W/O- LATE CHURAMONI SARMA, R/O- NIP ELECTRONICS, 8TH MILE, NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR, AMERIGOG, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI- 23, DISTKAMRUP(M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY, PWD (ELECTRICAL DIVISION), DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEEER PWD ELECTRICAL DIVISION GUWAHATI- 781003 3:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 781028 4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 28 5:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006
Page No.# 2/2
6:THE BRANCH MANAGER THE SBI LOKHRA BRANCH SONJUKTA SQUARE N H 27, LOKHRA CHARIALI GUWAHATI, PIN- 781034
7:THE BRANCH MANAGER THE SBI JORABAT BRANCH DIST- RIBHOI, MEGHALAY
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. K JAIN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
13-12-2021
Heard Mr. T. Jindal learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned Additional Senior Government Counsel for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. Mr. R.K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, the Accountant General, Assam, are present.
None has appeared for the remaining respondents.
Mr. Tusar Jindal, learned counsel appearing for Ms. K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioner have since been redressed and, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Manomaya Sarma W/o Late Churamoni Sarma
The State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court