Petitioner sought transfer of Family Court proceedings from Guwahati to Goalpara citing poverty and inability to travel. Court held respondent's agreement to pay appearance fees addressed grievances, so transfer was not warranted. Interim order vacated.
Interim order dated 05.02.2020 vacated; parties to appear at Guwahati; order for transfer of case rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010010122020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Tr.P.(C)./6/2020
RUMA SARKAR DEB
W/O- SRI SUDIP DEB, D/O- LATE NARESH CHANDRA SARKAR, R/O- VILLDARANGGIRI TARAPARA, P.O- DARANGGIRI, P.S- RANGJULI, DISTGOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783134
VERSUS
SUDIP DEB
S/O- LATE SUHASH CHANDRA DEB, R/O- SAGAR HOUSING COMPLEX, FLAT NO. 102/B, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, P.O- PANDU, GUWAHATI- 781012, P.SJALUKBARI, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : MS S CHAKRABORTY
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
10.11.2021
Heard Mr. U. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to transfer the Family Court proceedings from Guwahati to Goalpara given the petitioner's financial constraints.
Whether agreement on appearance fees satisfies the requirement for transferring jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RUMA SARKAR DEB
SUDIP DEB
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
