Bharati Roy v. Preetam Saikia and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the failure to release arrear salaries ordered earlier. Court found no willful violation by/respondents as they initiated payment process, though delay by Treasury Officer caused lapse. Liberty to file fresh petition for salary granted.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to approach appropriate jurisdiction for further consideration regarding payment of arrear salary granted. Petition closed.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010164972020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/535/2020
BHARATI ROY
D/O- LT. RAGHUNATH ROY HEAD TEACHER, GULTILLA LP SCHOOL, UNDER BEEO RAJABAZAR R/O- VILL AND P.O. DEWAN TEA ESTATE, P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788102
VERSUS
PREETAM SAIKIA AND 2 ORS IAS, THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM CIVIL SECRETARIAT, BLOCK-C, DISPUR, GHY, ASSAM, PIN- 781006
2:BIJOYA CHOUDHURY THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY ASSAM- 781019 3:SUMITRA DEV AES DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM PIN- 78800
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A PHUKAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authorities in the Elementary Education Department willfully violated the order to release salary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bharati Roy
- respondent
Preetam Saikia
- respondent
Bijoaya Choudhury
- respondent
Sumitra Dev
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/535/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court