Petitioner moved under a specific scheme order regarding compliance with a contempt petition; the petitioner argued the order was complied with, leading the court to close the contempt petition. No substantive issues were framed as none were required for closure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010148392021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/352/2021
SMTI KUSUM DEVI
W/O SRI KAMALA KANTA BHATTACHARJEE, R/O VILL-BALIKARIA (SARUSATAR CHUBA), P.O.-BALIKARIA, P.S.-NALBARI, DIST-NALBARI, PIN-781341, ASSAM
VERSUS
BISWADEEP DAS
CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, HENGRABARI, GUWAHATI, DIST-KAMRUP(M), PIN-781036, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
08.12.2021
Mr. P.P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
order has been complied and accordingly, the contempt petition may be closed.
In view of the submission made by Mr. P.P. Borthakur, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SMTI KUSUM DEVI W/O SRI KAMALA KANTA BHATTACHARJEE
BISWADEEP DAS CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HENGRABARI GUWAHATI
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
