Allowed

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Sri Arun Bordoloi and Anr.

Gauhati HC4 Jan 2021I.A.(Civil)/1807/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interlocutory application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the Gauhati High Court condensed a 43-day delay in filing an appeal against a Workmen's Compensation award. The court noted no objection from the respondent and ordered the connected appeal to be registered and listed.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 43 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and award dated 09-10-2018.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Sri Arun… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Gauhati HC (2021)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC010118872019

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1807/2019

¶5

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

¶6

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-7.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

SRI ARUN BORDOLOI AND ANR S/O- SRI DHIREN BORDOLOI, R/O- VILL.- KUSKATI, P.S. LAHORIGHAT, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782127.

¶9

2:SRI BOLORAM BAISHYA S/O- LATE MAYARAM BAISHYA R/O- VILL.- SOBANCHA P.S. HAJO DIST.- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781102

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GOSWAMI

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B K JAIN (R1)

¶12

Linked Case :

¶13

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

¶14

Page No.# 2/2

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

SRI ARUN BORDOLOI AND ANR

¶17

-----------Advocate for :

¶18

Advocate for : appearing for SRI ARUN BORDOLOI AND ANR

¶19

BEFORE

¶20

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Date : 04-01-2021

¶23

The parties are represented by the learned counsel.

¶24

By this interlocutory application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant prays for condonation of delay of 43 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and award dated 09-10-2018 passed by learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Guwahati, in W.C. Case No. 137/2006.

¶25

Mr. B.K. Jain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that he has no objection in condoning the delay of 43 days in preferring the appeal.

¶26

Having considered the cause of delay shown in the application and also the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 that he has no objection in condoning the delay, the application is allowed and the delay of 43 days in preferring the appeal stands condoned.

¶27

Office to register the connected appeal and list for admission reflecting the name of Mr. B.K. Jain in the cause list as counsel for the respondent No. 1 in the appeal.

¶28

IA stands disposed of.

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

Comparing Assistant

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Sri Arun Bordoloi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., v. Sri Arun Bordoloi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Chandra Vs the State of Assam

Vikash Chandra Vs the State of Assam

Vikash Chandra Vs the State of Assam

Maheswar Hira Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Kalpana Das and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Sri Kalpana Das and Anr. Vs Sri Bablu Suklabaidya and Anr.