Kamal Paul v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner applied for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC. After reviewing the case diary, the Court held custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted interim bail made absolute.
What did the court decide?
Interim pre-arrest bail made absolute on same terms and conditions.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010013632021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/353/2021
KAMAL PAUL
S/O JAGANNATH PAUL, R/O VILL-NO. 2 KANUPARA, P.S.-KACHUGAON, DIST-KOKRAJAHR, BTC, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted pre-arrest bail in an offence under Sections 294/153(A)/506 IPC read with Section 66 IT Act.
Whether custodial interrogation is essential for the investigation of the offence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamal Paul
- respondent
The State of Assam Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/353/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court