Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul Akond v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.PC was dismissed. The Court found the victim's statement under Section 164 Cr.PC clearly implicated the petitioner in offences under the POCSO Act, concluding this was not a fit case for bail. Purchase. 5-10-2021 High Court. 14. Page No.# 2/2
What did the court decide?
Application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.PC rejected; petition disposed of. Return case diary.