Aktarul Islam Hoque v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court rejected a pre-arrest bail application under Section 438 CrPC, holding that the gravity of the allegations involving illegal arms and specific intent warrant necessary custodial interrogation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010111812021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2161/2021
AKTARUL ISLAM HOQUE S/O ABED ALI, VILL. MASPARA, P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
ORDER
Date : 08-11-2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioner under Section 438 CrPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aktarul Islam Hoque
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/2161/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court