Indra Deka v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew writ petition instituting no substantive issue as grievance redressed during pendency.
Petitioner withdrew writ petition instituting no substantive issue as grievance redressed during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010273252019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/8246/2019
INDRA DEKA
S/O- LT. RABIDHAR DEKA, R/O GANESHGURI, HENGRABARI ROAD, PS- DISPUR, GHY.-06, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LAND AND REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06.
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI-01.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE GHY. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM.
4:DHRUBAJYOTI HAZARIKA
CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE GHY. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H K BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
- B E F O R E -
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 07-12-2020
Mr. U.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of his
client has been redressed during the pendency of this proceeding and, therefore, he has instructions not to press this writ petition.
Page No.# 2/2
Ms. M.D. Borah, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of the official respondents, is present.
On the request of the petitioner’s counsel, this writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
J U D G E
Comparing Assistant
INDRA DEKA
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
SUMAN SHYAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court