Writ petitioner informed the court that the petition was effected as it became infructuous on instructions. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner. No substantive legality was examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010233512017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 6671/2017
1:BHRIGU THAKURIA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O JITENDRA THAKURIA R/O NAOKATA PO- NAOKATA PS- GORESWAR DIST. BAKSA ASSAM VERSUS
1:THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER and 9 ORS. ASSAM THE ASSAM INFORMATION COMMISSION JONAKEE COMPLEX PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37 2:STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM POWER DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CO LTD APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN OF APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR APDCL
Page No.# 2/3
BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01
5:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER DISTRIBUTION APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 6:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HRA APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01
7:DY. GENERAL MANAGER LAW/SPIO O/O M.D. APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN GHY-01
8:THE GENERAL MANAGER GUWAHATI ZONE APDCL LAZ SIXMILE GUWAHATI
9:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RANGIA ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL
10:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER RANGIA ELECTRICAL DIVISON APDCL LAR RANGIA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S BIKASH Advocate for the Respondent : SC APDCL
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
13-02-2020
Heard Mr. S. Bikash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. D. Das, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the respondent APDCL.
On instructions of the petitioner, Mr. S. Bikash, learned counsel submitted that as this writ petition has become infructuous, the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed being not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bhrigu Thakuria
The State Information Commissioner, Assam
The State of Assam
The Assam Power Distribution Co Ltd (APDCL)
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
