Satyendra Sarma v. the State of Assam and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner abandoned the writ petition citing it as infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
The petitioner abandoned the writ petition citing it as infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010233512017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 6310/2014
1:SATYENDRA SARMA
S/O ABANI SARMA R/O KACHARI SOLMARI P.O. RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM POWER DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI. REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR APDCL GUWAHATI.
3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER DISTRIBUTION APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI.
4:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HQ APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI.
5:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HR APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI.
6:THE D.G.M. HR APDCL LAR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI.
Page No.# 2/2
7:THE GENERAL MANAGER GUWAHATI ZONE APDCL LAZ SIXMILE GUWAHATI.
8:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RANGIA ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL.
9:ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER BAIHATA CHARIALI ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION RANGIA ELECTRICAL CIRCLE APDCL.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S BIKASH Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
13-02-2020
Heard Mr. S. Bikash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. D. Das, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the respondent APDCL.
On instructions of the petitioner, Mr. S. Bikash, learned counsel submitted that as this writ petition has become infructuous, the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed being not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Satendra Sarma
The State of Assam
The Assam Power Distribution Co. Ltd.
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court