The petitioner was instructed by counsel not to press the writ petition, and the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010148812020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
WP(C) No. 552/2019
KAMAL DAS Address:S/O- LATE GIRINDRA NATH DAS R/O- VILL- RAIPUR P.O- RAIPUR P.S- PATACHARKUCHI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM, PIN- 781325
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Address:REP. BY THE ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DM DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 2:REVENUE AND DM (LR) DEPTT Address:REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM ASSAM SECRETARIAT (CIVIL) DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY Address:TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DM (LR) DEPTT ASSAM SECRETARIAT(CIVIL) DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Address:DIST BARPETA P.O AND P.S- BARPETA PIN- 781301
5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER Address:BAJALI REVENUE CIRCLE
Page No.# 2/2
PATACHARKUCHI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781326 6:MOUZADAR Address:HARIH MOUZA P.O- RAIPUR P.S- PATACHARKUCHI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781325 -----------Advocate for : R SARMAH Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS: Advocate ,
, , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
20-11-2020
Shri H. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed not to press this writ petition.
Shri J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department as well as Shri S. S. Roy, learned State Counsel are present.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
KAMAL DAS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
